XII SOCIALISM AND THE WAR One of the surprises of the War was the complete breakdown of international socialism.

But since, as Socialism becomes more and more a question of practical politics, differences of theory tend to produce differences in conduct; and since a political paper must have a single editorial programme in practical politics, it would obviously be most inconvenient for me to retain my position as co-editor.

Socialism in action is of course always the expression of a more or less socialistic philosophy shared by a majority of the people.

Socialism is no remedy, no ism is a remedy; things are so.

Meanwhile Socialism is always a word, a symbol used in common speech and writing.

To say that socialism is not anarchy is a good preparation for the explanation of what socialism really is.

# Active socialism is group action in economic affairs.

Socialism is coöperation instead of competition.

Socialism is faith in the group motive and group action rather than in self-interest and competitive action.

The "Socialism" of TaxationBut there is another form of State interference which is more direct and significant than any of these.

Fabian socialism was the first systematic attempt to meet the fatal absence of administrative schemes in the earlier socialisms.

Socialism, which is curiously confounded by the indiscriminating with Anarchism, is its exact opposite.

"Socialism, in its purely economic aspect, was a well-meant attempt to abolish the law of competitionthat is, the natural law of the Survival of the Fittest.

# Socialism in the partizan sense is an actual political organization.

These two say Socialism is a thing they do not want for men, and I say Socialism is above all what I want for men.

Socialism is a Trust of Trusts.

And incidentally it may enable me to make clear what Socialism in the broader sense, constructive Socialism, that is to say, is.

During that time Socialism has become a more and more ambiguous term.

Since this conscious socialism is not an industrial force of any great influence in England, it is not here necessary to discuss the claim of the theoretic socialist to provide a solution for the problem of poverty.