In the old copy this is made a part of what Warman speaks, which is a mistake, as is evident from the context.

[The printer has made havoc with the sense here, which can only be guessed at from the context.

See Halliwell in v.; but the explanation there given hardly suits the present context, where the word appears to be used in the sense of a term, a period.

For a family cannot be maintained by texts and contexts!

Hence he is unfairly cited by ethical writers as having declared himself for the lie of expediency; whereas the context shows that that is not his position.

surroundings, context, environment 232; location 184.

Thanks to the actual and allegorical role of interactive technologies in our work and lives, we may now have the ability to understand many social and political constructs in very new contexts.

Thy vein, says he perchance, is all too free; Thy smutty language suits not learned pen: Reply, Good Sir, throughout, the context see; Thought chastens thought; so prithee judge again.

You take the text to speak of the latter, when the context plainly sheweth you that it speaks of the former.

' It would be interesting, if it were feasible, to point out the epoch at which the text mode of arguing in polemic controversy became predominant; I mean by single texts without any modification by the context.

Whoever reads the four verses (John v. 16-19,) attentively, judging of the meaning of each part by the context, must needs, I think, see that the [Greek: íson heautòn poiôn tòn Theô] (18) refers,not to the [Greek: paterá ídion élege tòn Theòn], (18) or the [Greek: ho patáer mou] (17), butto the [Greek: ergázetai, kagô ergázomai] (17).

By some strange blunder, Lichefild says they came to Cananor; but from all the circumstances in the contexts, it is obvious that the fleet came to anchor on the outside of the bar at Pandarane.

Sarcey has used the phrase so often, and in so many contexts, that it is impossible to tie him down to any strict definition.

But here, as in so many other contexts, we must turn for the classic example to the Oedipus Rex.

These, however, were even more confusing; the same words and phrases, grafted on other contexts, took on an accent and a colour that he had not given them.

After a few introductory remarks explanatory of the context, he proposed to inquire what are the things which "enter into" ("constitute," we should say) the inheritance of God's people.

Having noticed the context, he proposed to inquire, first, into the necessity of being born again.

Hence, when we assert either the 'identity' of 'A' in two contexts, or that of 'A' and 'B,' in 'A is B,' we are clearly ignoring differences which really existi.e., we postulate that in spite of these differences A and B will for our purposes behave as if they were one ('identical').

The undersigned considers it unnecessary to enter into the question whether according to the context the circumstance expressed by the adverb "alone" has reference to the verb "divide" or to the verb "include," because even allowing it to refer to the former it does not appear to the undersigned that his interpretation of the passage is thereby impaired or that of Mr. Fox sustained.

Let us then examine this passage with the help of the context.

He has quoted his enemies' mistakes without their excuses, their texts without their contexts.

When these torn and bleeding passages are restored piously to their contexts they are destructive to the legend of tragic passion.

Of this and most of Mr. Malham-Dembleby's parallels it may be said that they only maintain their startling character by the process of tearing words from their sentences, sentences from their contexts, contexts from their scenes, and scenes from the living body of each book.

Of this and most of Mr. Malham-Dembleby's parallels it may be said that they only maintain their startling character by the process of tearing words from their sentences, sentences from their contexts, contexts from their scenes, and scenes from the living body of each book.

These fields of experience that replace each other so punctually, each knowing the same matter, but in ever-widening contexts, from simplest feeling up to absolute knowledge, can they have no being in common when their cognitive function is so manifestly common?