"Popular Fallacies" will go on; that word "concluded" is an erratum, I suppose, for "continued."

When my sonnet was rejected, I exclaimed, "Damn the age; I will write for Antiquity!" Erratum in sonnet.

Suae erit humanitatis et sapientiae (which Tully enjoineth in like case) siquid erratum, curare, aut improvisum, sua diligentia corrigere.

"Popular Fallacies" will go on; that word concluded is an erratum, I suppose, for continued.

When my sonnet was rejected, I exclaimed, "Damn the age; I will write for Antiquity!" Erratum in sonnet:Last line but something, for tender, read tend.

[Footnote 1: Erratum, for M. & K. read K. & M. Booksellers after Authors.]

[Footnote 3: [150], corrected by an Erratum.

Erratum in No. 238.]

[Footnote 2: [W. P.] corrected by an Erratum in No. 152 to W.S.] * *

[Footnote 4: [T.] corrected by an erratum in No. 268.]

A few seem to have the Latin plural only: as, arcanum, arcana; datum, data; effluvium, effluvia; erratum, errata; scholium, scholia.

1. Write the plurals of the following nouns: town, country, case, pin, needle, harp, pen, sex, rush, arch, marsh, monarch, blemish, distich, princess, gas, bias, stigma, wo, grotto, folio, punctilio, ally, duty, toy, money, entry, valley, volley, half, dwarf, strife, knife, roof, muff, staff, chief, sheaf, mouse, penny, ox, foot, erratum, axis, thesis, criterion, bolus, rebus, son-in-law, pailful, man-servant, fellow-citizen.

Also an erratum in verse 104, line 2, where the word fortune should be VIRTUE.

" Erratum in the Washington "Globe."For

* Erratum in page 2the line quoted from Montgomery should be "The parrots swung like blossoms on the trees.

This, however, was cancelled by an Erratum in the next number.]

[Footnote 8: "would not break the thread of this discourse without;" and an ERRATUM appended to the next Number says, 'for without read with.'] *

[Footnote 3: [150], corrected by an Erratum.

Erratum in No. 238.]

[Footnote 2: [W. P.] corrected by an Erratum in No. 152 to W.S.] * *

[Footnote 4: [T.] corrected by an erratum in No. 268.]

[Footnote 4: Altered by an erratum to [inconsiderable] to avoid the repetition insignificant, and insignificancy; but in the reprint the second word was changed.]

[Footnote 2: [considerable] corrected by an erratum in No. 301.]

[Footnote A: This erratum has been suffered to remain in the edition of the Knight's plays now before us, published in 1692.]

[Transcriber's note: The original text referred to the "Louirville Journal" (clearly an erratum).